论《合同法》中预期违约制度的完善——以CISG为视角
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

湖南师范大学法学院,湖南,长沙,410081

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:


On the Perfection of Anticipatory Breach in Contract Law——From the Perspective of CISG
Author:
Affiliation:

XIE Qiong (Law School of Hunan Normal University, Changsha, Hunan 410081)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    随着合同实践的深化,英美法系国家率先以判例的形式创造了预期违约制度,大陆法系国家在其成文法中也逐渐形成了类似于预期违约的规则。《联合国国际货物销售合同公约》(CISG)集两大法系之大成,将预期违约分为预期非根本违约和预期根本违约。我国《合同法》中建立的预期违约制度尚存有体系安排不合理、构成要件不明确、判断标准不具体、救济方法不完备等问题和不足,有必要通过学习CISG对之加以完善。

    Abstract:

    With the deepening of practice in contract, anticipatory breach was firstly created by countries of Common Law System in terms of prejudication. Rules, similar to anticipatory breach, were gradually accepted by countries of Civil Law System.CISG broke through the traditional model of anticipatory breach and classified it as subordinate anticipatory breach and fundamental anticipatory breach. The Contract Law of the People' s Republic of China has formally accepted anticipatory breach. However, there are still some defects:the illogicality of the system; the indeterminacy of essence ; the unspecification of standard of judgement; the incompleteness of relief measures, etc.To perfect anticipatory breach in Chinese Contract Law, it is necessary to study CISG.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

谢琼.论《合同法》中预期违约制度的完善——以CISG为视角[J].西昌学院学报(社会科学版),2009,(2):67-70.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-06-06