对“机器是不可以被骗的”的批判
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

西昌学院,四川西昌615013

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:


Criticism on the Conclusion That Machine Can't be Cheated
Author:
Affiliation:

NIE Jing-bo(Xichang College,Xichang,Sichuan 615013)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    "机器是不可以被骗的"是基于法律分析方法的错误,引起了就机器是否可以被骗的肯定论和否定论的无意义的长期争论,进而强化了法律分析方法的错误,其作用也随着国外计算机诈骗罪立法和我国司法解释的发展而消失,而利用传统的标准完全可以区分盗窃和诈骗,即行为人取得财产是否由能够处分财产的人因为受骗并基于由被骗所致的认识错误而作出的处分行为所致,因而应该立即抛弃这一观点。

    Abstract:

    The conclusion that machine can’t be cheated has brought about long insignificant debate about whether machine can be cheated or not on the basis of wrong law analysis way,which moreover intensified the mistake in the way of law analysis.With the foreign legislation of fraud by computer and the development of our country’s judicial interpretation,the judgment is losing his role.The point that the theft and fraud can be distingnished easily with the traditional norm that whether the property that the——gets is chating from the original owner and the misunder standing based on that should be abandoned right now.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

聂京波.对“机器是不可以被骗的”的批判[J].西昌学院学报(社会科学版),2010,(4):98-100,104.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-06-06