中国哲学合法性问题再议
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

虎雪梅(1991—),女(回族),宁夏西吉人,在读硕士研究生,研究方向:西方哲学比较研究

通讯作者:

基金项目:


Legitimacy of Chinese Philosophy Reconsideration
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    自从中国哲学这一学科确立以来,学界曾就“中国哲学合法性问题”进行过多次讨论。就西方学者而言,其否定中国哲学 的原因在于以西方哲学理论模式为标准,衡量并排斥中国哲学。以傅斯年为代表的中国学者则是站在保护中国文化的角度来 提出“中国无哲学”的观点。笔者认为:不论中国哲学还是西方哲学,都是“哲学”这一“属”之下的“种”,中西方哲学既有其共性 又有其独特意蕴。面对“中国哲学合法性问题”,中国哲学的发展应在突破西方哲学理论的视域、发掘中国哲学的独特意蕴的 基础上,注重跨文化比较视域中中西方哲学的会通。

    Abstract:

    The academic circles have discussed "the legitimacy of Chinese philosophy" for many times since the subject of Chinese philosophy was established. For western scholars, the reason why they deny the Chinese philosophy is that they measure and reject the Chinese philosophy by following the mode of western philosophy theory. For some Chinese scholars, such as Fu Sinian, puts forward the view of "Chinese no philosophy" in the view of protecting Chinese Philosophy. The author thinks that no matter China philosophy or western philosophy, they are both philosophy of the same "Genus" under the same "kind". The Chinese and western philosophy have something in common, but they also have their unique implications. When facing the problem of Chinese philosophy legitimacy, the development of Chinese philosophy should be based on the breaking away from western philosophy theory and the development of unique Chinese philosophy implications Besides, we should pay attention to the commonness between Chinese and western philosophy in cross cultural comparative perspective.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

虎雪梅,滕海滨.中国哲学合法性问题再议[J].西昌学院学报(社会科学版),2006,(2).

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-05-10