生态治理、生计韧性与乡村振兴——栖居视角下大理古生村的田野调查
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金项目“云贵高原湖泊治理进程中各民族可持续生计能力提升研究”(项目编号:24CMZ041);云南省哲学社会科学规划项目“洱海治理背景下流域白族生计重嵌实现路径研究”(项目编号:N202215)。


Ecological Governance,Livelihood Resilience and Rural Revitalization:A Field Investigation of Gusheng Village in Dali from the "Dwelling Perspective"
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    中国式现代化强调人与自然和谐共生,农业农村现代化是其重要组成部分,其中乡村振兴是总抓手,生态保护是基础支撑,而高质量发展是实现路径,三者共同构成了新时代“两山论”的实践内涵。然而在一些以技术理性为主导的生态治理中,环境依附群体的“生计安全”往往被置于次要地位,导致保护与发展之间产生结构性张力,制约宜居宜业和美乡村建设。基于英格尔德的“栖居视角”,对洱海治理背景下古生村的案例进行分析发现:一方面,居民依托地方性知识与身体实践调适人地关系,展现出乡村振兴所需的本土智慧与内生韧性;另一方面,乡村社会中传统技能传承中断、互助关系弱化、生态智慧边缘化等文化危机,又成为制约乡村高质量发展的关键瓶颈。未来的环境治理应超越单一工程主义范式,将地方性知识、社区参与连同文化延续纳入核心考量,兼顾环境质量与居民福祉的同步提升,从而真正推动“两山”理论的实践转化与“人—地—社会”系统的可持续发展。

    Abstract:

    Chinese modernization emphasizes harmony between humanity and nature,of which the modernization of agriculture and rural areas is a core component. Within this framework,rural revitalization serves as the overarching lever, ecological protection acts as the fundamental support,and high-quality development constitutes the implementation pathway.Together, these three elements form the practical connotation of the "Two Mountains" Theory in the new era.However,in some ecological governance practices guided by technological rationality,the "livelihood security" of environment-dependent groups is often relegated to a secondary position.This has created structural tension between conservation and development,hindering the construction of livable, business-friendly and harmonious villages.Based on Tim Ingold''s Dwelling Perspective,this study analyzes the case of Gusheng Village against the backdrop of Erhai Lake conservation and governance. The findings reveal twofold dynamics: on the one hand,local residents have negotiated human-environment relationships by relying on local knowledge and embodied practices,demonstrating the indigenous wisdom and endogenous resilience required for rural revitalization;on the other hand, cultural crises in rural society — such as the breakdown of intergenerational transmission of traditional skills,the erosion of mutual support networks,and the marginalization of ecological wisdom — have emerged as key bottlenecks restricting the high-quality development of rural areas. Therefore,future environmental governance should transcend the narrow engineering-centric paradigm, incorporate local knowledge,community participation and cultural continuity into core considerations, and strive for the simultaneous improvement of environmental quality and residents'' well-being. Only in this way can we truly promote the practical transformation of the "Two Mountains" Theory and achieve the sustainable development of the human-environment-society system.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

杨跃雄,黄博伟.生态治理、生计韧性与乡村振兴——栖居视角下大理古生村的田野调查[J].西昌学院学报(社会科学版),2026,38(3):23-35.

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-23
  • 最后修改日期:2026-02-01
  • 录用日期:2026-01-16
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-07-02